Identify inaccuracies, document supporting evidence, and correct reporting errors using a structured, compliance-first method designed for consumers in the USA & Canada.
A credit score is simply the outcome; the real story lies within the underlying report data. Proper analysis examines account details, balances, limits, payment history, dates, and status codes—not just the score itself.
A structured audit uncovers inconsistencies, documentation gaps, and reporting errors that may influence underwriting decisions, then prioritizes corrections based on verified evidence and measurable impact.
Key Outcomes:
Before reviewing errors, obtain complete, up-to-date consumer disclosures from all major credit bureaus in your country. Because each bureau maintains its own file, inaccuracies may appear on one report but not another, making side-by-side comparison essential for lender and scoring consistency.
Incorrect name variations, addresses, employers, or data belonging to another individual with a similar identity.
Accounts that are not yours, incorrect authorized user designations, or duplicate reporting of the same account.
Incorrect current balances, missing credit limits, or reporting that inflates utilization signals.
Late payments that do not align with billing statements or payment confirmations.
Accounts reported as open vs. closed incorrectly, paid accounts marked unpaid, or charge-off statuses misreported.
Incorrect open dates, last activity dates, or delinquency timelines that affect aging models.
Unrecognized inquiries, duplicated entries, or incorrect classification (hard vs. soft pull).
Effective disputes target specific data fields — not blanket requests to “remove the account.”
Some reporting fields influence underwriting models more than others. Prioritize reviewing these high-impact data points first: